Enterprise AI teams
Agents or workflows preparing to receive tools, credentials, write access, customer-impacting decisions, or production authority.
FOUNDING QUALIFICATION PARTNER PROGRAM · LIMITED INTAKE
Put one consequential AI authority surface under real pressure.
This program is for organizations willing to test a real AI workflow, agent, or governed architecture under a tightly bounded scope. The objective is not to showcase the system. The objective is to discover what the evidence supports before production grants it more authority.
WHO FITS
One system. One real authority problem. One bounded engagement.
AI vendors
Products that need independent pressure on authority, scope, identity, provenance, delegation, or failure behavior before wider deployment.
Regulated organizations
Healthcare, financial, insurance, public-sector, research, or other environments where consequential actions require reconstructable authority and evidence.
Research & governance teams
Organizations exploring how policy, authorization, testing, and runtime controls meet in actual intelligent systems.
THE ENGAGEMENT
Define → Attack → Preserve → Repair → Retest → Widen.
01Define the target and authority surface
02Map prohibited actions and consequences
03Establish evidence and test boundaries
04Adversarially pressure the system
05Preserve failures and decision lineage
06Repair only where authorized and in scope
07Rerun the exact failure condition
08Widen and issue a scoped evidence conclusion
PARTNER DELIVERABLES
Artifacts you can actually inspect.
Authority Surface Map
What the target can do, what it may do, what it must not do, who can authorize it, and what changes invalidate that authority.
Adversarial Evidence Pack
Scope, attack families, findings, preserved failures, repair lineage, exact retests, widened tests, and explicit limitations.
Revalidation Triggers
Defined model, prompt, tool, identity, permission, dependency, policy, or architecture changes that require renewed testing.
PROGRAM RULES
No guaranteed pass. No hidden expansion of scope.
Partners pay for governed evaluation, not approval. EPMOS does not require production credentials at first contact. Initial work can be synthetic or sandboxed where appropriate. Protected EPMOS internals remain protected; client confidential material is handled only under explicit scope and agreement.
FIRST STEP
Bring one consequential decision.
Tell us what the AI is supposed to be allowed to do, what it must never do, and what would make a failure materially consequential.